—Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus
Today is a watershed moment for me - today is my last day as a salaried employee of a corporation. Today is the day I retire at the ripe old age of twenty-six. "Retirement" in this context is a word I got from Henry. What does it mean? It means I will never "work" again ... if we take "work" to mean the thing that people begrudgingly do until they are sixty-five, and then, with relief, stop doing it. If, when I'm sixty-five, I want to stop doing what I have been doing for my entire adult life, then this means I have been directing all the time and energy of my entire adult life toward exactly the wrong thing. If one gives one's time and energy to the right thing, the one doesn't want to stop, ever. The key is to do the right thing - the thing that requires passion, energy, bravery, love, skill, creativity, mental alertness, excellence - the emotional and spiritual realities that we crave, rightly so, and the very realities that "algorithmic production" - the sort of meaningless, rote, habitual "work" we do now that we desperately want to retire from - prevents us from cultivating and enjoying. If one has to retire to begin to cultivate and expand these realities, than one should retire now, and not at the age of sixty-five. Not only is it a shame to miss out on the extreme joy of human existence, as orchestrated by these realities - it is also an irresponsibility, a shirking of one's intended purpose and potential. It is not "realistic" or "practical" to resign oneself to "algorithmic production" for several decades before retirement, and thus sacrificing passion, energy, bravery, love, skill, creativity, mental alertness, excellence, just to "pay the bills" -- because that is not reality, and that is not what it is to practice the art of being a human. The ideology that the fact that one must suffer through work until retirement is "realistic" and "practical," that "this is just the way it is," is a false ideology, propagated by a consumer culture whose soul-destroying and earth-destroying engine is run by masses of dejected, defeated, resigned wage-slaves. Today marks my first practical step in unwraveling my own habitual belief in this ideology. Today is a day of repentance, a turning away from that ideology.
What do I want to do instead? The opposite of "work" - in the sense outlined above, in the sense of the dreary thing which one must endure until being released at the age of sixty-five - is not sleep, or sloth, or laziness. I want every moment of every day of my life to require the extremes of passion, energy, bravery, love, skill, creativity, mental alertness, and excellence. What will be my work - in the redeemed sense of the word, in the old sense of the word work - the thing which made human being dignified, fulfilled, the thing which revealed the unparalleled creativity of human beings? I'm not sure. There is a sense in which I have to let myself free-fall out of the old paradigm, and fall into the new one - whatever that is. What is the gravity that thrusts me out of the grasps of the old paradigm and hurtles me toward the new? I fiind in myself the desire to write. That desire is unescapable, and to ignore it would be to ignore the voice of God. In the Land of Ice, I hope to catch a glimpse of the truth that this desire to pushing me toward.
All that being said, there is good in everything. I will miss two things very much about this job: 1) the view and 2) the people. Both have been beautiful. Check out these pictures I look from my office window.
Love,
graham
Thank you for your definition of retirement, and hats off to you for recognizing that your current work was not life-giving and having the wherewithal to do what you love!
ReplyDeleteI am glad you wrote "if" in: "If one has to retire to begin to cultivate and expand these realities, than one should retire now, and not at the age of sixty-five." Because I do think it entirely possible to have a job that one doesn't necessarily love, but still are able to cultivate creativity and beauty and love.
Reminiscent of Thoreau's Economy.
I look forward to hearing of your subsequent adventures.
Excellent first post Graham. In thinking about what you wrote, I myself have really been in a state of semi-retirement now for several years-one foot hesitatingly doing limited mass work to make ends meet whilst also pursuing my projects on the side and during summer sessions. I think the baby boomer generation does not understand this. My parents certainly do not. They are perplexed by a son who does so well in school and graduates from college with two degrees only to not really seek gainful employment. Hands are tied here, and I think what you, Henry, and I are doing is very legit.
ReplyDeleteTotally agreed, Ruth -- I think the key is: To what extent does what you do to make a living open up a horizon of possibility? You are right - one can have a job that one doesn't like per se, but still see the cultivation of creativity and beauty and love as viable possibilities within that context - and in that case (so long as the job isn't environmentally or socially destructive), one can manage it. What we need to stop doing, though, is tolerating jobs in which we see zero possibility for the life of the spirit -- JUST for the money, or JUST because "that's how life is."
ReplyDeleteTed - totally, man - you have definitely shirked the alluring temptations of steady mass employment. You are on a good track. We will collaborate ... I am particularly excited about your idea to tie ministry to the poor in South America with furthering your sustainability skillset ...